buyappleacc.com is a reputed website selling apple developer account, providing us, China and worldwide developer individual accounts for sale. It's at low price and good quality. Always provides satisfying services!

HomeSocialtext

『亚马』逊云账(号)(www.2km.me)_Will Investors go along with a weaker ‘Fed put’?

admin2022-01-1155

「<亚马逊云{『账号』}>」

「<亚马逊云{『账号』}>」www.2km.me)‘<提供>’aws{『账号』}、aws{全区}号、aws32v{『账号』}、「<亚马逊云{『账号』}>」出售,‘<提供>’api ,‘质量稳定’,“数量持续”。《另有售》azure oracle linode等{『账号』}.

Policy actions: The Fed building in the US capital. While the Fed has a window to deliver an orderly policy normalisation, there are reasons this opening is uncomfortably tighter. — AFP

MANY have viewed the pullback in markets this week, including the sharp fall in the Nasdaq, as a reaction to the release of minutes from the Federal Reserve’s (Fed) December policy meeting that were more hawkish than expected.

That raises two interesting issues for markets and the economy: Why were investors taken by surprise, and what are the implications for future price moves?

The market-moving aspect came from the higher combined probability of three policy moves in 2022: the end of large-scale asset purchases; a series of interest rate increases; and the possibility that the Fed will start to reduce its balance sheet.

The catalyst for this was two-fold: The recognition by the Fed, albeit a belated one, that inflation has and will continue to be higher and more persistent than what was expected and, therefore, well above its target; and the judgment that the labour market will soon meet, if it hasn’t already, the second element of the central bank’s dual objectives, that of maximum employment.

Given the economic data in the run-up to the December Fed meeting, let alone what has come since then, neither of these two contributing factors should have come as a great surprise to markets. The fact that they were can be attributed to another less-than-full alignment between the content of the Federal Open Market Committee discussions and how they were portrayed in the press conference that immediately followed them. This is particularly the case for the treatment of a potential contraction of the Fed’s balance sheet.

What happens next will depend in large part on whether the evolution of inflation and employment validate the now more hawkish expectations.

While the Fed still has a window to deliver an orderly policy normalisation, there are two reasons this opening is uncomfortably tighter than it was a few months ago or ever needed to be. (Consider my repeated advocacy, as early as April of last year, for the Fed to start its tapering process.)

First, the Fed’s prolonged misjudgment of the inflation dynamic means that it now has to move virtually simultaneously with three measures that reduce monetary accommodation, greatly increasing the risk of a policy misstep. Second, this withdrawal of accommodation risks coinciding with other contractionary winds emanating from a de facto fiscal tightening and the erosion of household savings, threatening a bigger reduction in the momentum of economic growth.

Given the extent to which the Fed’s record injection of liquidity has boosted asset prices in the last few years, it should come as no surprise that the prospective reduction of that liquidity is causing anxiety about the prospects for a fourth consecutive year of double-digit returns for US stocks. Whether it will lead to outright losses depends in large part on whether the second driver of the “everything rally” – that is, behavioral – will also be reversed.

Reviews